Rendered at 17:53:39 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
stanfordkid 33 minutes ago [-]
There is no reason for us to even be fighting in this war, or in the middle east. I don't know how Israel managed to convince Trump this was a good idea. Let's never forget Netanyahu was a big part of the lobby for Bush to invade Iraq.
mikelgan 4 hours ago [-]
The changes include refining processes for vetting targets and adding open-source data feeds to better track civilian movement.
ck2 3 hours ago [-]
They already had a process that could have prevented the murder of hundreds of children
It was a human review group for chosen targets
They got rid of them, on purpose
That's negligent homicide
btw you'll notice that billion dollars per day of bombing for months now has also changed absolutely nothing
just like decimating Iraq changed nothing, Afghanistan war changed nothing, Vietnam war changed nothing, Korean war changed nothing
each time a President would never learn, only double down in cost and lives
it's almost like war changes nothing, just kills a whole lot of innocent people
unless that's actually the point
which would be a war crime
the pause in the war now is only because they need to develop a billion dollar bunker-buster for pickaxe mountain and then it's back to accidentally killing civilians by negligence again
meanwhile we are starving Cubans to death via illegal blockage for no reason, only the cruelty is their point
if the Dems do not get the Senate, imagine this country by 2029
SlightlyLeftPad 2 hours ago [-]
All completely true statements; How long do you think before this comment gets flagged?
asdigonio 10 minutes ago [-]
>That's negligent homicide
Trump has repeatedly threatened Iranian civilians. He has repeatedly said he will attack civilian infrastructure and has made genocidal comments—"a whole civilization dies tonight", as I recall.
Accepting "collateral damage" and using automated systems that are known to identify bogus targets is guaranteed to kill civilians. The fact that the killing is random and the ostensible objective is legitimate does not change the outcome. If the actual goal were to kill civilians, that could be accomplished with deliberately sloppy airstrikes on deliberately uncertain targets, with negligence serving as a smokescreen. You could assuredly carry out war crimes through deliberate negligence.
The actual outcomes of these airstrikes align with our president's stated goals. I don't necessarily believe this is a coincidence.
metalman 2 hours ago [-]
Now that the US military is fully integrated with the ZGF( zionist genocide force) they can just atribute anything 'difficult' to them and say they know nothing for certain.
It was a human review group for chosen targets
They got rid of them, on purpose
That's negligent homicide
btw you'll notice that billion dollars per day of bombing for months now has also changed absolutely nothing
just like decimating Iraq changed nothing, Afghanistan war changed nothing, Vietnam war changed nothing, Korean war changed nothing
each time a President would never learn, only double down in cost and lives
it's almost like war changes nothing, just kills a whole lot of innocent people
unless that's actually the point
which would be a war crime
the pause in the war now is only because they need to develop a billion dollar bunker-buster for pickaxe mountain and then it's back to accidentally killing civilians by negligence again
meanwhile we are starving Cubans to death via illegal blockage for no reason, only the cruelty is their point
if the Dems do not get the Senate, imagine this country by 2029
Trump has repeatedly threatened Iranian civilians. He has repeatedly said he will attack civilian infrastructure and has made genocidal comments—"a whole civilization dies tonight", as I recall.
Accepting "collateral damage" and using automated systems that are known to identify bogus targets is guaranteed to kill civilians. The fact that the killing is random and the ostensible objective is legitimate does not change the outcome. If the actual goal were to kill civilians, that could be accomplished with deliberately sloppy airstrikes on deliberately uncertain targets, with negligence serving as a smokescreen. You could assuredly carry out war crimes through deliberate negligence.
The actual outcomes of these airstrikes align with our president's stated goals. I don't necessarily believe this is a coincidence.